Resource Use Permit

Print the article

This entry was posted on 6/21/2007 9:37 AM and is filed under uncategorized.

    One of the most interesting topics during the assessment of CBFM  in 2005 discussed by participants with intense  emotions is the issue on Resource Use Plan and its subsequent cancellation.  (RUP) is a permit issued by DENR to the community with a CBFMA who plan to venture on utilizing timber for commercial purposes.



    RUP is the most awaited part of every CBFM program in a community because they believed that through the RUP they are now in a position to use their resources with the same footing as the previous capitalist who logged in their area. Ironically, according to them this is also the source of their frustrations.

     As experienced, assisting government agencies are a little slow in assisting the community with their utilization plans. Communities were discouraged to embark on this type of business. They were told that the resources were not enough for their business to profit and they are not ready for the many complications of this business. The worst case came when the log ban was  implemented. A case in point is the experience of the Subanen community of Cuyan-Butin CBFM in RT Lim Municipality, Sibugay, Zamboanga.




    The community said that they were keen to participate in the CBFM program because of the promise of having the right to utilize their resources and finally profit from it. According to them, they had problems with the processing of their papers. There are many confusions and complications especially because they were not familiar with the documents that the DENR required. They also complained about the expenses that they incurred so as  to comply with these requirements. In fact, they said that it was all easy for capitalist to obtain permits through proper channel or by the use of money than for the community to get their permit to utilize.

 
    After a long struggle of document processing and the tedious completion of requirements, the community finally got their permit to cut trees within their plantation. They entered into contracts with buyers and financiers to sustain the financial requirement of their business. However, barely six months after the issuance of their permit, a national policy of a log ban was implemented. This national directive consequently nullified their Resource Use Permit and suddenly their operation became illegal. 



    The community was frustrated with the log ban. The first reason is the cost they have to pay for the processing of their papers. The second is the cost of their six-month operation of cutting and hauling the logs close to the road. The saddest thing to see is the logs that would not be transported and sold due to the log ban.

 

    The log ban adversely affected the environment because the trees felled were  never   used and there is no way to replace these trees. Second, is that people will have no interest for the program and for planting and caring of trees. On top of this, the logs were  left to rot along the road because it would be illegal to use or sell it. The worst is; the community paid for all this loss. In some areas, even if the suspension is  lifted, the damages are already irreversible.

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
Trackback specific URL for this entry
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments

    • 7/17/2007 9:08 PM Hannah T Fairbank wrote:
      Interesting piece. A few thoughts: The blanket suspension of CBFM RUPs has at the same time negatively impacted the integrity of the CBFM structure and CBFM group's confidence in the framework, while also spurring action on the part of these groups to voice concerns about the suspension and to participate in ongoing policy dialog surrounding the suspensions. The fact that some of these CBFM groups and federations now have the capacity and institutional strength to organize around this issue is a positive sign for the future of the CBFM program. On the other hand a collaborative process of rebuilding the integrity and trust of the framework is critical to a successful future for CBFM in the Philippines. Identifying effective and nuanced methods for addressing illegal logging and harvesting of forest resources within the CBFM program is an imperative which the experiences, expertise and opinions of CBFM groups and federations could positively contribute to.
      Reply to this
      1. 7/30/2007 9:04 AM Cecil wrote:
        Dear Hannah,

        Thank you for the insightful thoughts that you shared with this blog.

        I agree with you that the RUP suspension affected not only the community and the resources that we are trying to protect but also showed as detrimental to the integrity of CBFM. This program, tagged as a triumph of community forestry and a strategy for sustainable forest management seem to have lost the confidence of the communities.

        The actions and voices from groups and CBFM communities are very much essential towards building and rebuilding the integrity of CBFM framework and structure. We all hope that the policy be refined and that experiences and expertise of these communities will be in the very foundation of the policy.

        Bisita balik diri sa Mindanao.

        Ayo ayo,
        Cecil
        Reply to this
    Leave a comment

     Name (required)

     Email (will not be published) (required)

    Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.